Every source cited on this claim, counted once at its highest evidence strength and grouped by the side it supports. Generated from this page's own evidence rows — the same records the verdict is computed from — so the chart and the score cannot disagree. Strength labels follow the scoring methodology.

Source: bbc.com · Cited in: Exxon knew about climate change decades ago, research shows

Supran et al. (2019) graph comparing ExxonMobil’s climate projections with subsequent observed global warming, showing that many company projections were broadly accurate.

A clear visual of the evidence that ExxonMobil possessed relevant climate knowledge decades ago. That knowledge may inform deception claims, though it does not by itself prove an actionable misrepresentation or legal liability.

View figure at source: Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil's climate change communications

Figure from the analysis of ExxonMobil’s climate communications comparing rhetorical frames across communication types, including themes such as uncertainty, individual responsibility, and technologic

Visualizes the communication patterns at the heart of public-deception allegations and helps distinguish public messaging from the company’s scientific knowledge. It is evidence relevant to the claims, not a judicial finding of liability.

All contributions are reviewed for clarity, balance, and evidence. The strongest insights are elevated into the argument graph — with credit to you.

Help improve this analysis →

𝕏 Share Facebook LinkedIn